A supply company representative recently took a call from a frustrated client. The client complained about a competing company’s aggressive “Delivery and Installation Special” and insisted that the rep step in and accuse the competitor of predatory pricing. While the rep understood the client’s frustration, he gently explained that pricing strategies of other companies were beyond his control. Instead, he shifted the focus back to what his company could offer—reliability, quality, and long-term value.
This scenario underscores a challenge that many sales reps and companies face: navigating the tension between competitive pricing and maintaining customer trust.
Predatory pricing refers to the practice of lowering prices so drastically that competitors struggle to stay in business, with the ultimate goal of monopolizing the market. However, it’s important to recognize that not all aggressive pricing tactics fall under this category. In this case, while the competitor’s special offer might seem overwhelming, it’s more likely part of a standard competitive pricing strategy, rather than a legal violation.
Clients, like the one in this story, may sometimes expect their account representatives to intervene in competitive pricing battles. However, as the rep in this situation wisely pointed out, it’s important to recognize what is and isn’t within the company’s control. Challenging a competitor’s pricing strategy is not only ineffective in most cases, but it can also shift focus away from what the company should be emphasizing: its own strengths.
When faced with aggressive competitor offers, sales reps need to handle the situation with professionalism and calm reassurance. Instead of getting drawn into the competition, it’s often more effective to focus on building strong relationships and highlighting what sets your company apart.
Here’s how companies can respond when competitors offer aggressive pricing strategies:
In the case of the supply company rep, his response was a model of professionalism. By politely explaining that he couldn’t intervene in the competitor’s pricing strategy, he maintained his integrity and prevented an escalation. Instead of being drawn into the drama, he focused on guiding the conversation back to what the client could control—choosing a provider based on overall value, not just a short-term discount.
When faced with frustrated clients who are concerned about competing offers, companies can prepare by proactively addressing potential concerns. Here’s how:
The lesson from this interaction is that companies need to remain focused on their value, even when competitors engage in aggressive pricing tactics. The rep in this case handled the situation perfectly by staying calm, gently explaining the limitations of his influence, and shifting the conversation back to what his company could provide. Ultimately, the goal isn’t to win a pricing war but to create long-lasting client relationships based on trust, quality, and value.